Wednesday, October 29, 2014
Divorce Attorneys Loudoun Virginia Alimony Desertion
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case. An attorney from our
firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our
law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Claudius v. Claudius
Facts:
Defendant husband sought review from a decree of the Circuit Court of Loudoun (Virginia) that granted plaintiff wife a divorce a mensa et thoro on the basis of desertion and abandonment and awarded her alimony. The circuit court denied the husband's cross-bill for a divorce a mensa et thoro on the basis of desertion.
If you are facing a Divorce case in Loudoun Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The Virginia Court made the following holding:
- One spouse is not justified in leaving the other, unless the conduct of the other is sufficient to establish the foundation of judicial proceeding for a divorce. Mere coolness and denial of sexual intercourse, where other marital duties are performed, do not constitute cruelty or desertion in the sense used in the law of divorce.
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.